Wilson Center questions I
I don't get it. I don't understand why the August Wilson Center for African American Culture might close.
It seems to me everyone in the black community is sitting around, waiting for someone to save the place. Why?
Where is the massive outpouring of blacks' support for their cultural center? Where are the fundraisers? The bingos? The bake sales? The walk-a-thons?
Where are the students standing on street corners in Pittsburgh, including the Hill District, soliciting funds so their cultural center can be saved?
Where are the kids from the city schools, such as Brashear, Westinghouse, Obama Academy and Perry high schools, seeking donations during the lunch hour, asking kids to give up their lunch money to save this cultural mecca?
Surely, a concerted effort by Pittsburgh Public Schools with its students would be a valuable learning experience about responsibility to one's community.
Where are the donations from wealthy black bankers, movie stars and media moguls who can surely afford to pay the bankruptcy court a paltry $10 million?
I just don't get it. August Wilson's character Troy, in his drama “Fences,” may have said it best: “I done learned my mistake and learned to do what's right by it. You still trying to get something for nothing. Life don't owe you nothing. You owe it to yourself.”
The writer is a retired Pittsburgh Public Schools teacher.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bible under attack
- Gruber, then & now I
- Voting insanity
- Family first
- Gruber, then & now III
- Gruber, then & now II
- Postal questions
- EPA impoverishing seniors
- Hypocrisy & B’nai B’rith
- Armed & prudent
- On right track