Corbett's sleight of hand
Gov. Tom Corbett wants to stand on his record of cutting unemployment in Pennsylvania, but he chooses to do this through a false positive.
Before Corbett took office, a person needed to earn at least $50 in a week to receive a “credit week,” meaning it could be used toward compiling unemployment benefits. Shortly after taking office, Corbett and the Legislature doubled the weekly minimum amount earned toward a credit week to $100. It has since increased to $116 per week.
This was done so fewer people would qualify for unemployment and, as a result, he could state that the Pennsylvania unemployment rate is decreasing.
The formula used to calculate the qualifications for unemployment has made matters even worse. The state looks at the last five quarters of a year and totals the four highest. Under the new law, if someone earns a lot of money in one quarter, it can make that person ineligible for unemployment. This hurts seasonal workers' ability to collect unemployment.
Corbett and his legislative supporters also are sticking it to employers. In 2012, the maximum an employer paid for employees toward unemployment was $8,000. That increased in 2013 to $8,500 and it will rise incrementally to $10,000 per employee in 2019.
Throughout Corbett's term, seemingly no one has been safe except for Marcellus shale gas drillers. He's attacked the working class of Pennsylvania, particularly the unions. His commercials state that he wasn't elected to make friends — but he wasn't elected to demean the working class.
One more thing: On his recent trip to the Vatican, Corbett received blessed rosaries from the pope. If my tax dollars paid for this trip, I would like to know where I can go to receive a set of these rosaries?
The writer is an independent payroll consultant.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Misinformation persists
- UMW fighting EPA regulations
- Zionist view
- Amendment levels playing field
- Focusing on curriculum
- People’s Pledge
- Low blow