REACH for answers
Are Franklin Regional Senior High School mass-stabbing suspect Alex Hribal and Anjohnito Willet, the suspect in shootings outside Brashear High School, twins? Both committed acts of extreme violence at school and are being tried as adults.
It sends ripples of pain through our communities when we hear about dangerous behavior in our schools. It feels better to think of these boys as sociopathic adults who must be isolated from the rest of society.
However, brain research clearly indicates these boys won't have adult reasoning abilities until they are around age 23. Predicting when an eruption of violence will occur is extremely difficult; however, recognizing the warning signs of severe distress building up and taking steps to reduce this distress are very possible.
Colleagues Maureen McHugh, Christian Vaccaro and I have developed the REACH (Research, Education & Advocacy for Community Health) conference that will be held May 20-23 at Indiana University of Pennsylvania. This conference will help attendees identify ways, whether big or small, they could contribute to a grassroots movement to make interpersonal violence a rare event.
If you come to the REACH conference, you may leave feeling tired and irritated that there is so much to think about if we want to end violence. If we build a community of determination, we can reduce acts of violence in our community. To register, go to iup.edu/reach .
The writer is an IUP psychology professor.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- It’s not personal
- Getting bad advice
- Amendment levels playing field
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Out of ‘other people’s money’
- HUD & Larimer
- Low blow
- Diplomatic difference