Pa. horse breeding on the rise
Because of casino slots revenue, the opportunities in Pennsylvania standardbred racehorse breeding have never been better and we breeders should be proud.
As a result of our good fortune, in 2013 there were over 2,500 mares bred in Pennsylvania, hundreds more than in Ohio, Indiana, Ontario and New York. The numbers are proof that Pennsylvania is a popular place to breed horses. And this, when the total number of standardbred mares bred in North America fell from 14,230 in 2012 to 12,465 in 2013.
In the state Legislature, there is an effort to move the management of Pennsylvania racing from the Department of Agriculture to the Pennsylvania Gaming Commission. If that's not bad enough, they're considering consolidating — or perhaps eliminating — the Thoroughbred and standardbred racing commissions.
This is a terrible idea. My experience in observing the casino operators' investment and promotion of horse racing points to very poor results. As to a combined commission, look at what has happened in Maryland — a total disaster. I am not in favor of any of this.
The writer is the president of the Pennsylvania Standardbred Breeders Association.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wrong on GOP view of Obama
- Race & society
- Social Security woes
- AKA joint effort?
- Challenge & media
- Laborers’ choice
- More radio woes
- Need bus service in West Vandergrift
- Still speeding
- New policy falls short
- Appreciating the Trib I