Obama's 'red line' problems
It seems like our good ol' USA is in more trouble than most of us realize.
Our esteemed president has found a new pastime – drawing “red lines.” He drew one each in Arizona and Nevada. On the Arizona line, he refuses to enforce U.S. immigration law. On the Nevada line, President Obama, Sen. Harry Reid and the federal Bureau of Land Management felt free to send an armed posse of hundreds to enforce grazing fees on a cattle farmer.
Obama also drew “red lines” in Syria and Ukraine. Those were jokes. I hope he runs out of red crayons soon.
Racism is alive and well. The L.A. Clippers' owner had his outburst. Obama played the racist game when he said Trayvon Martin could have been his son. Oprah Winfrey played her race card, too, but chose to do it in England. Racism is divided between both political parties to neither's advantage.
It's been said, “Seek the truth and the truth will set you free.” Somehow this nation has forgotten who said this and what it means.
Veterans fought for freedom, but we forget them. High-ranking military officers have been forced to retire when they disagreed with the current administration.
Think long and seriously before you cast your next ballot. You want more of the same? I hope and think not.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Inconsistent Wolf
- Wolf is the right choice
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Watson in 33rd
- Gross in 45th
- Don’t fall for Wolf’s tax scheme
- Positive promise
- ObamaCare solution
- Shame on Wolf