Oppose BDS movement
I want to thank the VND and Trib Total Media for running the paid advertisement from FLAME (Facts and Logic About the Middle East) in the April 28 edition.
This ad, titled “The truth about the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement,” pointed out the unfairness of those who oppose Israel with those tactics.
Why should teachers union investments and all American investments be removed from Israel, even if those investments turn out to be slightly below market averages? Investment in our friend, Israel, is a very good cause, and Americans should know that.
Some BDS supporters have shamefully argued that the boycott is to respond to the 50-plus years of economic and military occupation forced upon the Palestinians. Are we to believe that?
These radical groups want America to believe they are only interested in the “deconstruction” of the land of Israel. They insist they have never called for the destruction of Israel, but rather its deconstruction. They explain that the deconstruction, as they see it, would result in a land where all people could live together in peace, freedom and equality. Are we to believe that?
Keep up the good work, VND, TTM and FLAME.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Corbett better choice
- Tax hits seniors
- Incomprehensible hatred
- Clueless on law
- Who’s responsible?
- Restore royalty minimum
- Wolf & ObamaCare
- Expanding their options
- HUD & Larimer
- Thanks to searchers