Like its flag, Springdale tattered
The American flag is a symbol of strength, pride and freedom. It represents the greatest country on Earth. The flag is proudly displayed across this nation and abroad, on ships, aircraft, uniforms and at schools, factories, and ball fields — even on the moon. It drapes the coffins of our fallen brave. It is the focus of the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem.
So how is the flag treated in Springdale? I recently took a photo of the flag displayed between Veterans Field and Lampus ball field. The flag is in two pieces and the stripes are shredded — at Veterans Field.
I mentioned the flag's condition to a borough employee months ago who told me they “have too many other things to do right now.” The grass beneath the flag is nicely maintained. I guess the grass is more important.
While it's a disgrace to display an American flag in this condition, it perfectly symbolizes the condition of Springdale. This flag is torn, tattered and divided by the blowing of the harsh winter wind. Similarly, Springdale residents have been torn, tattered and divided by the hot blowing wind of a misguided, immature and confused council.
Council members and employees pass this distressed flag daily, but don't have enough pride in our flag or town to replace it. The police officers who ignore the flag have in the past ignored the basic freedoms it represents. Considering the department's civil rights abuses — plus one former officer sitting in federal prison — the irony of a tattered flag flying over this town is striking.
Our council should replace the flag and contact the Boy Scouts for a proper and respectful disposal. After all, the only difference between Springdale Council and the Boy Scouts is the Boy Scouts have adult leadership.
The more things change in Springdale, the more they remain the same.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Blame misdirected
- Progress not reflected
- Voters capable
- Scapegoating easy; solutions not
- Steel at stake, too
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Beware this Wolf II
- Reverse red-kettle ban II