In his column “Doctors caught in Leviathan's maw” , professor Ralph R. Reiland is correct to identify philosopher Ayn Rand's works as providing an intransigent defense against the erosion of physician autonomy that has steadily increased since the creation of Medicare, the biggest socialized medicine scheme that exists in this nation.
What is often neglected in this debate is what Mr. Reiland's column addresses: When health care is declared a right, what happens to the rights of health-care providers forced to provide that care and to the rights of those forced to pay for that care?
As Reiland recognizes, and employs a quote from Ms. Rand to illustrate, all government health-care schemes view health-care providers as mere fuel to be used in a state enterprise, and it is our sanction that must be withdrawn to return a free market and individual sovereignty to this field from which they have been all but eradicated.
Amesh A. Adalja
The writer is a board-certified infectious diseases physician.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Gruber, then & now II
- Bible under attack
- Postal questions
- Gruber, then & now I
- Voting insanity
- Gruber, then & now III
- Family first
- Enforce immigration laws
- Back to ‘Mad Men’?
- No new stadium for Kiski
- Revisionism now