Keeping trees healthy I
In the news story “Fungus lays waste to oak trees in Pittsburgh parks” , the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy's director of park management and maintenance policies said nearly 200 large oak trees have been cut down in city parks, including 58 in Schenley Park, because of oak wilt.
Awful, yes, but by removing these, other trees throughout the parks will be saved, since the fungus that causes oak wilt can infect other trees through root systems and beetles.
Thanks to one conscientious park user who paid attention, many other trees in the parks stand a chance.
This person knew the signs of oak wilt (bronzing and wilting of upper leaves, leaves that turn brown along the edges and shedding of green leaves in midsummer) and sounded the alarm.
Given another year or two, the fungus would have taken an even greater toll on the parks.
So, take note! We can all help keep our trees healthy.
Watch for symptoms of oak wilt, emerald ash borer (D-shaped holes in ash bark) and hemlock woolly adelgid (white cottony egg sacs on hemlock branches).
Don't move firewood. Make sure you prune your trees at the appropriate time of year.
Together, we can keep our park, street and backyard trees standing tall.
Greer Argyros Mulholland
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ambrosini’s logic lacking
- Better stores needed
- Treat UNC like PSU
- Intelligent discussion overdue
- Superstition’s role
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Watson in 33rd
- Don’t fall for Wolf’s tax scheme
- Gross in 45th
- Making it special