The Peoples Library Board is deeply concerned that the Westmoreland County Federated Library System may rush through a new formula for state and county funding that will substantially cut our funding ( “Library funding change studied,” May 1).
We want the county board to take its time to consider the significant impact such a reduction will have on Peoples Library and the children and adults we serve. We need a fair and equitable formula.
A $31,000 annual cut in our funding is severe. Results could include:
• Closing both the New Kensington and Lower Burrell libraries for another day of the week, reducing service from five days to four.
• Reducing services for children, students and adults. We had approximately 400 children and teens attend our summer learning programs last year. We have after-school and summer tutoring programs for elementary schoolchildren and pre-school programs coordinated with Head Start and day care centers.
• Limiting the many adults and students without home computers who use ours daily to do research and look for jobs.
All libraries have absorbed substantial cuts in state funding in recent years, and we've increased our fundraising efforts to make up that shortfall. But our area is not a wealthy one. The New Kensington-Arnold School District has one of the highest levels of students who qualify for free and reduced lunches in the county.
We hope the county library board will help us maintain the essential services that we provide.
The writer is president of the Peoples Library Board in New Kensington.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.