Bad timing for library referendum
This year has not been kind to the wallets of many Allegheny Valley School District residents. Although Harmar Township and Cheswick held the line on taxes, Springdale Borough raised its by 44 percent; Springdale Township's taxes went up by 10 percent. The school district is looking to raises taxes yet again, this time by 2 percent.
This leaves the proposed .25-mill tax increase referendum on the ballot Tuesday in a very bad spot.
This proposal to provide dedicated annual funding for the Springdale Free Public Library, which will keep it from operating at a deficit, has good intentions. But it could not have come at a worse time. Citizens are seeing their taxes go up regularly, so voting to increase their own taxes is a tough sell.
If the economy was a bit better and the threat of rising taxes was not prevalent, then I believe most would vote yes. Plus, turnout for the election is expected to be low, so the library will be lucky to get one municipality to vote in favor of the increase.
The library board simply picked the wrong year to put the referendum on the ballot.
Shawn Fitzgerald, Jr.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- What happened to manners?
- ‘And another thing...’
- Already lying
- Appreciating the Trib I
- Missing WJAS
- Detail military cuts
- Kill ‘Lio’? Remember ‘Bambi’?
- Still speeding
- New policy falls short
- The ‘Tree of Agitation’
- Rushing to judge