More than just money
In her column “ObamaCare's lackadaisical layabouts” , Michelle Malkin convincingly enumerates the vast sums paid by the Obama administration for contractors to hire employees who do nothing to sign people up for ObamaCare, and for at least four state ObamaCare exchanges that have spent $500 million before giving up and shutting down.
Far more distressing than the waste of our money is the government's waste of our health.
The current scandals at the Department of Veterans Affairs illustrate the deaths of many veterans while waiting months to see a doctor. A few years ago, active-duty soldiers were housed in dilapidated, filthy, rodent-infested buildings at Walter Reed Army Medical Center — within sight of the VIP suites maintained for members of Congress and the administration.
Combat-wounded veterans and active-duty soldiers are disregarded by an indifferent bureaucracy while the government relentlessly expands its control of all medical care. What can the rest of us expect from this loving embrace of government?
Richard E. Ralston
Newport Beach, Calif.
The writer is executive director of Americans for Free Choice in Medicine (afcm.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.