Share This Page

Classroom nonsense

| Sunday, June 8, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

I was astounded to read Walter Williams' column “White privilege” recounting the ridiculous and idiotic goings on at the recent White Privilege Conference in Madison, Wis. I heard nothing about this on any newscast. According to Williams, this conference was “attended by 2,500 public-school teachers, administrators and students from across the nation” and included lessons so outlandish in their subject matter and content as to boggle the mind.

The purpose of any education system, public or otherwise, should be imparting knowledge and teaching students how to think — not what to think! Conference session leader Kim Radersma stated that “teaching is a purely political act and that neutral people should ‘get the (expletive) out of education.'” Well, that explains why our universities are filled with left-wing professors intent on extolling the virtues of socialism, Marxism and communism to the young minds captive in their classrooms. Any student having conservative views is almost assured of receiving a failing grade.

Further examples of the conference lunacy included claims that white people did not exist before 1681, capitalism is the cause of racism and teachers should insert social justice and anti-racism into all lesson plans. What kind of nonsense is this?

Young minds should be educated, not indoctrinated, and parents should demand unbiased, fact-based education for their children. Thank you, Mr. Williams, for the heads-up!

Norma Rowley

North Versailles

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.