It is interesting that Secretary of State John Kerry would characterize Edward Snowden, who revealed to everyone the NSA's massive surveillance program on U.S. citizens, as “a man who has done great damage to his country” and anything but a “patriot,” and would say that Snowden should “man up,” as reported in the news story “Kerry to Snowden: ‘Man up'” on the Trib's May 29 front page.
Is this the same John Kerry who tossed his own ribbons and the medals of other Vietnam veterans and said, “I am not doing this for any violent reasons, but for peace and justice, and to try to make this country wake up once and for all”? This quote is amazingly similar to what I heard Mr. Snowden say in his interview with Brian Williams on NBC News.
On an issue related to releasing classified material: With the recent news that the Obama administration revealed the name of the CIA's top official in Afghanistan ( “White House blows cover of CIA agent” ), I find the irony of the Snowden case relative to the machinations of the administration on these issues to be absolutely overwhelming!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Missile defense, not talks
- Majority defied
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Positive & healthy ...
- Resigning right thing
- Thanks for the coverage
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Russia, not Rice
- Ferguson & contradictions
- Sticker shock
- More answers, please