New carbon regs
New carbon regs
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has issued a proposal for national protections from dangerous carbon pollution from existing power plants. Carbon pollution causes climate disruption and costs American communities billions of dollars from flooding, super-storms, wildfires and extreme heat.
These regulations will clean up the industries that create the lion's share of carbon pollution in our country. The new protections will also help reduce pollutants including smog, soot and mercury, which pose serious health threats across Pennsylvania.
We applaud President Obama and the EPA for their move to clean up our air, improve the health of our children and curb the worst effects of climate disruption.
The new safeguards not only protect our health and communities, but will spur innovation and strengthen our economy.
By moving to 100 percent clean energy sources, we'll create tens of thousands of American jobs and billions of dollars in new investment. Cutting pollution that harms our communities will save us billions of dollars in health costs, infrastructure repair and disaster recovery costs.
We hope to work with Gov. Tom Corbett to create a strong state implementation plan to protect Pennsylvania's families from harmful air pollution.
The writer is chapter director of the Pennsylvania Sierra Club.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Treat UNC like PSU
- Ambrosini’s logic lacking
- Better stores needed
- Intelligent discussion overdue
- Superstition’s role
- Barbour sentence shameful
- Embrace domestic energy production
- Making it special
- The email cleanup
- Wake up, voters
- Inconsistent Wolf