Down syndrome bill
Down syndrome bill
As the uncle of a beautiful young woman with Down syndrome, I strongly urge Pennsylvania residents to support the Down Syndrome Prenatal Education Act (House Bill 2111/Senate Bill 1339).
For many expectant parents, the prospect of raising a child with Down syndrome can be overwhelming. Fear, stereotypes, misinformation, political agendas and lack of answers can quickly eclipse the inherent dignity, humanity and blessings that these incredible children bring to families and communities.
Down syndrome occurs in approximately one out of every 700 births in the United States. Over 90 percent of children diagnosed prenatally with Down syndrome are aborted. The Down Syndrome Prenatal Education Act would require doctors to provide expectant parents with up-to-date information including physical, developmental, educational and psychosocial outcomes; life expectancy; clinical course; intellectual and functional development; treatment options; and contact information for supportive services and other parental resources.
In a society that places a high value on “choice,” this law would ensure that parents understand they have more than one choice when it comes to their child's diagnosis.
Keith G. Kondrich
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Oberdorf firing incomprehensible
- Better school security
- Missing WJAS
- Life Care Center a jewel
- Failing city, Steelers
- The ‘Tree of Agitation’
- Football tab ‘incomplete’
- Even bigger waste
- Steel at stake, too
- He’d kill the golden goose
- Few on these buses