Share This Page

Refocus on moon

| Saturday, June 14, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Regarding The Washington Post story “NASA's strategy for Mars a failure” : If NASA had focused on the moon after the first astronauts landed, there would be a moon base by now. There would probably be a colony by now. And the necessary experimental data to put a manned flight on Mars would have been gathered. We might even have been to Mars by now.

It is a tragedy that the moon landings were written off and focus was diverted to other projects. The advances that could have occurred by now can only be guessed at.

As to Congress and the president arguing over what should be done now, the answer is simple. We need to pick up where we left off and direct our energies to a moon base that is within our reach.

Mary Ann Mogus

Greensburg

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.