Share This Page

Negative portrayal

| Saturday, June 14, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
SUBMITTED
The U.S. Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron, the Blue Angels, fly in the Delta Formation over downtown Pittsburgh near Point State Park, Wednesday, June 4, 2014. Charleroi native Lt. Mark Tedrow is flying Blue Angel 6.

Just one Air Force vet's opinion: Carl Prine's news story “Air shows' link to military recruitment iffy” was a very negative “hatchet” piece on air shows and military demonstration teams in general. It's important to show the American taxpayers that we have exceptional military capability and members. What better way to instill American pride than to see actual precision demonstrations?

Speaking of precision, the Blue Angels were not flying at Mach 1, which is the speed of sound.

The related stories “Military participation means more spectators, more money” and “Region's recruitment dipped in most show years” were more liberal sociologist babble. Is the Trib trying to make us feel bad about the military and our country?

Just to counter these stories' point, we will still have to pay military members, buy equipment, and service and replace aircraft. We are an exceptional nation with exceptional people. Let's not apologize for showing it off. In fact, let's stop apologizing altogether.

David Gebhart

Unity

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.