ShareThis Page

No common sense

| Tuesday, June 10, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

We are sending the wrong message to our children.

Reading the newspapers and listening to the idiotic and depressing stories on the morning, afternoon, 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. newscasts are enough to make a person retreat to a mountaintop somewhere far, far away from the media.

I am really tired of reading about the outrageous salaries of CEOs who have been fired but get “bonuses.”

I'm sick of hearing about the stupid antics of Justin Bieber. Who is he and why are we giving him so much attention?

I'm tired of Lady Gaga — she should change her name to Lady Gag-me. And don't even get me started on Miley Cyrus.

What finally pushed me over the edge was the story about poor 7-year-old Darin Simak, who was actually suspended from Martin Elementary School in New Kensington for two days for accidentally taking a toy gun to school in his backpack and being smart enough to tell his teacher.

Does anyone else see what's wrong with that picture? Because of the lack of common sense in our schools today, this child now thinks telling the truth gets someone punished, which it did.

I truly believe there has to be something in the air or water that's causing bad decisions to be made. I have to wonder where we are headed with horrible leadership starting at the very top. I won't mention any names — we know who these people are.

Chris C. Schubert

Lower Burrell

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.