Share This Page

Opposite experience

| Tuesday, June 17, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

In response to the letter “Reps unresponsive” : I have had the opposite experience.

I have contacted state Rep. Tim Krieger's office on several occasions. He and his staff have always replied and assisted me. Krieger has balanced his local responsibilities with those in Harrisburg well.

I have spoken with Krieger about Speedway's plans to operate in Delmont. I know others who have also. This development in the planned location will dramatically, negatively affect the quality of life for local residents. As a citizen of Delmont, Krieger has expressed his concerns but has no authority to insert himself into the process of local government or in matters of the court.

The zoning board followed the laws by permitting the development, but also ruled to protect the safety of our residents by denying traffic access from West Pittsburgh Street. Many accidents and fatalities have occurred at the intersection of West Pittsburgh and Route 66. Large numbers of cars and trucks entering and exiting there will greatly increase danger and will cause gridlock.

Speedway has appealed our zoning board's decision. Now it is up to the courts to decide.

Donna Duke

Delmont

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.