Energy tax the wrong answer
Pennsylvania's abundant natural gas resources continue to benefit our region. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission recently announced disbursements of shale impact fee tax revenues — totaling nearly $225 million for 2013 — to local counties and municipalities across the commonwealth, bringing the three-year total to over $630 million.
Westmoreland County and its municipalities, for example, received $4.1 million this year, bringing the county's total impact fee revenues to more than $12.2 million. From making important infrastructure investments to purchasing new safety equipment and helping fund strained local budgets, these revenues help our communities and improve our quality of life.
Shale development is breathing new economic life into our region while protecting and enhancing our environment through lower-cost, clean-burning natural gas. We're creating more jobs and providing the energy we need to keep our economy strong.
And a new poll shows that Pennsylvanians overwhelmingly support more jobs over new energy taxes. Unfortunately, some elected officials and those seeking office want to pass new energy taxes that could hurt job creation, stifle manufacturing and increase energy costs.
Let's continue to see through election-year politics and work together to get this generational opportunity right — now and for years to come.
The writer is the community outreach manager for the Marcellus Shale Coalition.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The high cost of illegals
- Making life better
- Worth the wait
- Happy birthday, Jesus
- State money wasted
- Open or give back
- Don’t forget military
- Shame on ATI
- None like him
- Incumbents’ edge?
- Pass GMO label bill