Just send them back
According to Reuters (emphasis added), “The Obama administration said it would boost the ranks of immigration judges, lawyers and asylum officers to quickly decide what happens to people apprehended at the border and to return them to their home countries.”
Why do we need “immigration judges, lawyers and asylum officers”? Just send these people back. They have no right to be here.
Would you tolerate an immigration judge, lawyer or asylum officer dithering over what to do if 15 of these people suddenly descended on your home? What's the difference?
You'd kick them out or call the police to kick them out if you could not do so with a baseball bat.
We should also. Why else have a border or laws for that sake?
M.S. Janosov Jr.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks
- Failing to lead
- Won’t stop drilling
- Boys, girls & toys
- Not clean enough
- Tarentum demolition
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- Wolf’s taxes
- Ride-sharing’s advantages
- Renaming in order?
- Confidence in our courts