ShareThis Page

Defying electorate

| Saturday, June 28, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

I find it incredible that Gov. Corbett is naming Harry Smail to Common Pleas Court in Westmoreland County ( “Corbett names 2 attorneys to Westmoreland bench” ). Having listened to two of Smail's speeches during the last election cycle, one in Harrison City and one in Irwin, I believe he would be an activist judge. He lost his last election to more moderate judges who reflect what I believe are the core beliefs of the county.

He has been rejected twice by the electorate in this county and should not be appointed. This appointment simply destroys the faith of the electorate. If you are rejected twice, that should speak volumes to the political elite.

I would urge state Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield, and the entire Pennsylvania Senate to reject this appointment and give the voters some hope that their votes really count. If not rejected, perhaps during the next election cycle we should vote against those who thwart the electorate's judgment.

Edward J. Blotzer

Penn Township

Westmoreland County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.