| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Buffer zones needed I

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Friday, July 18, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

As an obstetrician-gynecologist, I am deeply disappointed by the Supreme Court's ruling in McCullen v. Coakley striking down buffer zones around reproductive health clinics in Massachusetts.

As noted in the news story “Voiding of buffer zone at abortion clinics could force Western Pa. change” , this case is not just about Massachusetts but about clinics everywhere, including in Pittsburgh, and the very real violence directed at them.

My patients can attest that the painted yellow arc of Pittsburgh's 15-foot buffer zone has not restricted the free speech of anti-choice protesters. Every day, protesters hurl insults and lies at my patients to intimidate and shame them.

Given the history of violence against abortion providers in this country, my patients are right to feel threatened by this harassment. But once my patients reach the yellow line of the buffer zone, they are ensured safe passage into the clinic. That painted arc is an important and constant physical reminder that no one has the right to physically prevent a woman from accessing safe and legal medical care.

No person, man or woman, should have to fear for his or her safety for simply walking into a medical clinic.

The Supreme Court got this one wrong; buffer zones provide critical protections for patients.

Christy Boraas


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Catholicism & science
  2. Not one-sided
  3. Inspiring & welcome
  4. Seal the borders
  5. States & secession
  6. Outrageous & delusional
  7. Major issue, no action
  8. Bright lines: Budget battle
  9. USW not cause of ATI woes
  10. ‘Deflategate’ fault NFL’s
  11. Improve diabetes education