ShareThis Page

Cut government

| Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Gov. Tom Corbett and the Legislature want to cut-cut-cut, but not where they should.

Why don't we cut the number of legislators? We don't need 253 members to represent us. Then we could cut the salaries, per diems and expense accounts of those remaining, saving millions.

Why don't we cut legislative pensions? Some get more than $100,000 a year for the rest of their lives. And why should they get free health care for life?

I wish I had these terrific benefits. The government wants to cut-cut-cut from the people who pay-pay-pay so those in government can have these benefits.

And why did Corbett spend $100 million for outside legal counsel for a bunch of losing cases? That money could have gone to education, our roads and so much more.

Pennsylvania needs cut from within. Many programs could be cut to make the government smaller and less expensive, instead of taking money out of the pockets of working people for the government to spend-spend-spend — on themselves.

Yvonne Sabattini


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.