Springdale high-rise stabbing
My mother used to live in the Springdale Manor high-rise before she passed away. When she moved in, it was a nice facility. Most of the people were senior citizens who had lived in the area. It was a quiet, friendly atmosphere.
Over the years, different people managed the building and there was a gradual decline in the way the building was run. The Allegheny County Housing Authority eventually opened it up to people from all over the region. Some there were bedridden and should have been in a nursing home. Younger people who blasted music lived there and some with mental conditions were admitted. The list goes on.
The June 27 stabbing was a problem waiting to happen; I'm surprised something didn't happen sooner. The residents are screened before their applications are approved, but the stabbing suspect has an extensive criminal record. I'm stunned management permitted this. He should have been in jail — not living with senior citizens.
Maybe this will open some eyes once and for all. It's a shame this incident, which put so many seniors at risk, had to happen.
I'm sure many of the people who still reside there would agree with me.
The writer is formerly of Cheswick.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Gas industry obfuscates the truth
- Unhappy returns
- Low blow
- Slots payments’ source
- School funding
- Out of ‘other people’s money’
- Care for our children first
- Ex-Im & Westinghouse
- Wolf & ObamaCare
- Buffer zones needed II
- An Obama explanation