Dick Scaife, R.I.P. II
Being a conservative — or sometimes a libertarian — has many benefits. One little-known benefit, however, is to state something, support it by facts that cannot be refuted and then watch the results.
Sometime the liberals' heads will spin, as if mimicking a scene from “The Exorcist,” and then just as quickly explode. It's not the reason. It's just a benefit.
I never met Richard Scaife. But I have to believe, given what has been written about him, that he enjoyed that benefit.
He would have gotten that as he read that other newspaper's “R.I.P.” editorial, as they used it as an occasion to nonprofessionally take cheap shots instead of putting aside partisanship to take note of a man who helped their industry.
Spinning and exploding heads. And I think it would have made Mr. Scaife chuckle, if only for a moment.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.