Pa. has to find a new way
Homeowners in this state have had it. Our property taxes constantly go up because school budgets cannot be balanced. Real estate taxes are the main support for school districts, which is really unfair to homeowners. Pennsylvania has to come up with a way to fund school districts — and teacher pensions — without property owners being the main contributors.
The first thing should be to end property tax breaks for corporations. Then, the state should take more money from gambling revenue and fund our schools. Our Legislature made a lot of promises when it begged for gambling that haven't come true — particularly greatly reduced property taxes.
School boards get backed into the corner when it comes to balancing these budgets because of the way we are taxed. The state has to come up with some kind of tax reform.
Legislators should be making property tax reform in Pennsylvania a top priority. School districts need to make cuts in their budgets. Parents should be paying for extra activities that kids want to be involved in and teachers should pay more into their pensions.
I'm sure there are a lot of things that could save money in these schools. They just have to tighten their belts and get it done. Most of the time, I think school boards and administrators do a good job. It's our state lawmakers who need to step up and do theirs.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.