On a giant's shoulders
Dick Scaife was one of the most important figures in our country as he helped drive a principled agenda focused on the ideas of a limited government to fight against tyranny, the liberating impact of free markets, and the dignity and worth of each and every individual.
As a publisher, philanthropist and engaged citizen, he was undeniably crucial to the advancement of these goals.
Dick Scaife was a significant influence and he will be sadly missed.
Dick was a personal friend and a person of positive influence on my career. He took the time to meet with me on many occasions and I relished the opportunity to engage in discussions with him about so many people, places and issues. He was profoundly well read, well spoken, knowledgeable and, most importantly, so gracious to everyone with whom I ever saw him interact.
We will surely miss him and I am personally saddened by this loss, as I and countless people like me across the community, commonwealth and country have seen further by standing on the shoulders of this magnificent giant.
Rep. Mike Turzai
The writer, a Republican from Allegheny County, is the Pennsylvania House majority leader.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pedro must go
- Steel at stake, too
- Duty to disclose
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Good riddance
- Oberdorf firing