Corbett better choice
Gov. Tom Corbett has accomplished a lot, including keeping his promises, during his first term. He cut taxes and regulations, which allowed the private sector to create 178,000 new jobs since he took office in 2010. The governor has allowed Pennsylvania to become one of the leading energy producers in both natural gas and coal. He increased funding in education to the highest level ever in Pennsylvania.
Corbett just passed a $29.1 billion state budget that included no new taxes or tax increases. He has repeatedly called on the General Assembly to get pension reform done. Pension costs consume approximately 60 cents for every state revenue dollar earned. There were 163 school districts that called for raising their tax rates above the inflation rate to make up for the pension liabilities. This will increase property taxes on hardworking Americans. The governor displayed good leadership, standing up to these special interest groups and fighting for Pennsylvania taxpayers.
His opponent, Tom Wolf, failed to give his own budget that does not include any new tax increases, and he has stated that he does not believe that pension reform is a crisis.
Corbett is the superior and best choice for a stronger Pennsylvania.
The writer chairs the Plum Borough Republican Committee.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Affordable’? Not for him
- Arnold’s garbage
- Pass GMO label bill
- ATI’s broken promises
- Wrong on immigration II
- Protesters not law-abiding
- Thinly veiled disdain
- Library funds
- A buck to pass?
- Cameras not the answer
- Helping the horses