Share This Page

Getting bad advice

| Wednesday, July 23, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

So, the City of Pittsburgh spent tons of money researching potential candidates to replace Public Safety Director Mike Huss. Steve Bucar was hired to fill the position and his credentials are most impressive.

I cannot believe that in the short time he has been here, his first order of business will be banning police officers wearing baseball caps as opposed to the cumbersome, heavy, uncomfortable “dress” hats. This is why the soft cap was adopted.

Initially I thought, “What a stupid idea!” When I analyze the situation, I can't believe a person of Bucar's caliber would make this his first priority. Then I realized this couldn't have been his idea, but rather some other person's, blowing smoke in his ears.

With all the scandal the department has recently experienced, I can't understand how this idea surfaced, but director, you're getting bad advice. I believe he was hired to attempt to resolve many internal problems, which include naming a new police chief.

You don't need a search committee. You have the talent right here. The only advice I could give him is, “Watch your back.”

Joe Poniewaz

Lincoln Place

The writer is a retired Pittsburgh police officer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.