UAW won in Tennessee
As a fellow union brother (retired), I wish to congratulate the United Auto Workers on its diligence to bring union membership to the workers at the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., on July 15.
The new UAW Local 42 is a feather in the union's cap after the propaganda spread by Bob Corker, the former Chattanooga mayor who is now a U.S. senator. He falsely stated to the workers that if they agreed to a union, Volkswagen would move its new, mid-size SUV operations to Mexico. Volkswagen immediately rebutted his statement, saying forming a union would have no bearing on its decision.
The only uncertainty now is Volkswagen's continuing negotiations with the state of Tennessee on a proposed $300 million incentive package to persuade VW to build in Chattanooga. It's a move that could bring hundreds of millions in new investments and create hundreds of good-paying union jobs. Hopefully, the union victory won't result in Tennessee's lawmakers refusing to approve the incentives package they originally offered Volkswagen.
When a unionization vote failed in February, the conservative media labeled the defeat of the UAW a major blow to the union and union membership nationwide. Instead, the UAW responded with a major membership victory in Chattanooga.
Congratulations, UAW. You made the right-wing propaganda machine stick its big feet in its collective mouth.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Atheists & religious expression
- Article painted wrong picture
- Show appreciation
- Ferguson & sin
- Fitz draws ire
- Mitochondrial disease awareness