TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

HUD & Larimer

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, July 22, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

I had to respond to Roberta Lebedda's “robbing Peter to pay Paul” letter “HUD at cross-purposes” criticizing the Choice Neighborhood Grant to Larimer as if it was taken from the Continuum of Care funds assisting the homeless. She also suggested the Choice grant was mainly about creating parks.

This is like criticizing a doctor saving a person from a heart attack by saying the doctor isn't saving another patient from cancer. Homelessness is a critical issue, but so is repairing declining housing and neighborhoods.

Most of the Choice funds will be spent replacing rundown public housing in Larimer with housing for low- and moderate-income families ($21 million of the $30 million.) That can prevent more homelessness. To be eligible for Choice funds, a community has to write a plan to transform a neighborhood (including providing services to children and families) and commit local funds to replace facilities like sewers.

The Continuum of Care funds aren't being reduced to build park benches. In reality, Congress is moving from directly assisting individuals (such as reducing food stamp funds). HUD and other agencies will be directed to reduce funding for Continuum of Care-type programs.

Sheryl Stolzenberg

Sanford, Fla.

The writer, a Pittsburgh native and Peabody High School graduate who earned her master's degree in urban and regional planning from the University of Pittsburgh, is a principal planner for Seminole County government in Florida.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Politicians on display
  2. Jesus’ resurrection
  3. Disrespectful  deceit
  4. Roundabout doubt
  5. Bright lines: Mandatory voting
  6. Hell before Judgment Day
  7. Undeserved ridicule
  8. Curious priorities
  9. McKeesport stands as a role model
  10. Email mole hill
  11. Pension-letter ire II