Since I was forwarding ...
Mail call at my place, the USS Neversail, is unrelenting in solicitations for contributions for myriad causes. One such tale of woe was from the mother of a private serving an 18-year prison sentence for shooting and killing two Iraqi insurgents, as ordered, in a 2006 engagement with al-Qaida. Money is needed for her son's hearing before the Clemency and Parole Board. If not a hoax, and thinking it appropriate to bring to the attention of the commander in chief, I forwarded the solicitation to the White House.
I took advantage of this opportunity to tactfully chide President Obama. I wrote that also appropriate for his consideration is the release of Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi, imprisoned in Mexico. I enclosed a “Piranha Club” cartoon displaying ways to beat global warming, e.g., going to work in your shorts, filling your underwear with frozen vegetables, getting a job hanging briskets in a meat locker and sticking Popsicles up your nose. I captioned the cartoon “Pass to all global warming alarmists” and added, “You have a sense of humor, so enjoy the cartoon.” I also added the thought of banning corn ethanol's invasion of gasoline.
I briefly mentioned that the ISIS threat in Iraq dictates approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. And I let the president know he had misquoted Chief Sitting Bull, who said, “Let us put our minds together and see what life will make for our children” — words that should be inscribed within the U.S. Capitol's rotunda.
I don't anticipate a response or scrutiny by the IRS and NSA, but then again, who knows?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.