Share This Page

PETA & its tactics I

| Tuesday, July 29, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Regarding Nafari Vanaski's column “Vanaski: PETA's lettuce offered to aid city” : I'm one of many PETA supporters who chooses to wear a lettuce-leaf bikini in order to show people that they can get lean and healthy — not to mention help animals and the environment — by enjoying tasty vegan foods. Like Lady Godiva, who rode naked on a horse to protest taxes on the poor, I know that eye-catching ads and actions make people sit up and take notice. When the media report on PETA's activities, people visit PETA.org for free vegan recipes and other information.

I'm as comfortable wearing a bikini at a PETA event as I am at the beach. I only feel objectified when people imply that I should cover up, as if I'm not capable of making my own decisions.

PETA's ad, which says “Step Up to Good Health. Go Vegan!” and shows a woman in a lettuce bikini, promotes healthy eating. It can provoke discussion in a day and age when many are bored by facts and figures alone, and prompt people to try vegan foods so they can reap the health benefits of vegan eating.

Lindsay Rajt

Washington, D.C.

The writer is associate director of campaigns for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (peta.org).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.