Share This Page

Sickened again I

| Friday, Aug. 1, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

Regarding the news story “Mother, maternal grandparents charged in abuse of Mercer County boy” : Once again I am horrified to see another child starved, to the point of near death, and the alleged perpetrators of this crime walk free on insignificant bond. The print version of this story was a front-page sideline, with the Steelers' coach the featured story. Also, there was major discussion on the immigrant children's welfare further on inside the newspaper. Where is justice?

Were there no neighbors to see this starved child? Why were the paternal grandparents and the father satisfied not to be allowed to see the child? Why isn't attempted homicide included in the charges?

It isn't enough to say they will rot in hell if convicted! Some example needs to be made that puts the fear of God into savage people who turn against their own flesh and blood in such inhumane ways.

Do you remember Kristen Tater? She was one of my foster children, returned to her “parents” and starved to death. There needs to be public outcry over these children! Let this child be the last. Let this be our moral obligation.

Eileen Condie

Hempfield

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.