Arnold at the edge
Arnold's mayor and council put out a call for the citizenry to attend the July 8 public meeting. This meeting was organized to show the citizens where our city is and where it is headed.
Right now, we are at the edge of the abyss.
I was so disappointed at the lack of response by this community. I don't always agree with what the mayor and council are doing, but at least my husband and I showed up. There are 5,200 Arnold residents and only 37 showed. Most were firemen and their wives, council members and their wives and about 10 other residents.
Maybe if you get the VND, you read the report on the meeting. But reading the article is not showing support for your city. I know we're all “busy,” but sometimes there is a choice to make, and most residents made the wrong choice.
When we don't have the services we need — police, code enforcement, a city clerk, firefighters — we'll only have ourselves to blame. When we have to call New Kensington or Lower Burrell for services, don't blame the city. When your landlord isn't following codes or ordinances, blame yourself.
I don't care whether you make $50,000 a year or live in Section 8 housing, this is our home.
Where is the pride and respect for our city? It takes everyone to make a community, but this lack of support shows we are not a community.
If anyone takes offense at this letter, good. That shows I did the right thing in making people think.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.