Don't call them 'corporate deserters'
I got a kick out of the front-page article “Mergers abroad targeted” (July 25), wherein President Obama calls U.S. corporations that engage in offshore mergers to avoid high U.S. taxes “corporate deserters” and economically unpatriotic.
Currently, a U.S. company could own less than 80 percent of the combined merger to take advantage of a lower foreign tax rate. Obama wants a new law to require a 50-percent ownership to qualify.
In the president's socialistic mind, corporations exist in order to pay taxes. In actuality, they exist in order to turn a profit, which in turn provides jobs, products and stock market returns for many.
If our country enacts tax and regulatory policies hostile to a corporation's ability to make money, it will leave for greener pastures or cease to be able to compete in the international marketplace.
Rather than lowering the corporate tax rate, as Republicans would have, Obama would force companies to stay here and languish under his oppressive taxes and regulations.
When President Reagan was intent on dismantling the Soviet Union's “Evil Empire,” he said you can always tell how free a country is by how difficult it makes it for you to leave.
Freedom and capitalism go hand in hand, as do oppression and socialism.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Figures conflict
- Today’s big lie
- Fair pay for hard work
- Conservatives, back Corbett
- Puzzling trend
- Rethink NFL fandom
- More simply put
- Climate & hunting
- In PC we must