Punishment the point
Congressman Mike Doyle's recent letter to the NCAA president ( “Pa. congressmen ask NCAA to relax sanctions on Penn State football” ) is a perfect example of what was, is and will continue to be wrong with Penn State.
My congressman wants the NCAA to “sweep under the rug” the evil that was aided and abetted by the entire Penn State community. The Freeh report clearly states that the Jerry Sandusky child-abuse scandal occurred because of a “culture of reverence” for football at Penn State. In my opinion, the NCAA should have shut down football at Penn State as a punishment, instead of fining it.
Mr. Doyle says in his letter that he wants to protect taxpayers. However, I think it is because he is a Penn State alumnus and, like many “Penn Staters,” is unable to see the need for punishment of the football program.
Mr. Congressman, the issue is the morally indefensible inaction of the entire Penn State community to serve the idolatry of its once iconic but now tarnished coach and football program. That is the real issue here, not tax dollars, bowl games or cushy seats at the stadium.
The writer is a University of Pittsburgh alumnus.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.