I find the president's recent advice to corporate CEOs — quit complaining about regulations/taxes — to be comedy. He states, “I am concerned about making sure that we have a system in which the ordinary person who is working hard and is being responsible can get ahead.”
Then we'll punish them for the crime of getting ahead with regulations and taxes? And confiscate the success for redistribution? In liberalspeak, “regulation” is an excuse for a “fine” (aka extortion).
More Obama: “Feel free to keep your house in the Hamptons and your corporate jet, etc. I'm not concerned about how you're living.” Then why mention it in every speech and interview if you're “not concerned”?
May the taxpayer complain about the use of the ultimate in corporate jets, Air Force One (and its “carbon footprint”), for vacations and fundraising travel for the Democratic Party?
Obama labels some as “folks who don't have a right to complain.” This is still a democracy (for now), with a First Amendment right to complain. Will Dear Leader soon be taking his pen and issuing an executive order to stop certain “folks” from complaining?
Oops! Someone's knocking at my door. Hey, it's the IRS! They want to “talk.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- On right track
- Not ‘too stupid’
- Quarantine quandary
- Something special
- EPA impoverishing seniors
- Back to ‘Mad Men’?
- Election in review II
- Invite God to school
- Right on Promise
- Armed & prudent