Mosul's Christian holocaust
Thanks for running the Reuters' article “Bombings kill 27 as Baghdad staggers” (July 20), regarding Chaldean Catholics and other Christians in Iraq.
The dearth of information from the wire services has been pathetic despite the virtual elimination of Christianity in Mosul after 2,000 years. This is not just a sad historic event, it's a gruesome event with beheadings of young Christian men.
And the Western world's response? Yawn! No bipartisan congressional action. No telephone-and-pen executive order from President Obama. No United Nations Human Rights or Security Council resolutions.
An Islamic caliphate is now blooming in the Middle East and beginning to sprout in traditionally Christian countries such as France. And what about the United States? Since we have been unable to secure our borders and know the passion of jihadists, it's certainly plausible they are in our country.
One recalls Pastor Martin Niemöller's famous words regarding Hitler and the Nazis: “First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.”
The Rev. James Holland
The writer is the pastor of the Transfiguration Parish in Russellton.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.