TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Not taxpayers' responsibility

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

In response to the news story “Greensburg will provide interpreter for deaf boy” : I am pleased that children are choosing to be physically active; however, I don't believe it is the responsibility of taxpayers to pay for an interpreter so the boy can play in a city recreational soccer league.

I agree with Mayor Ron Silvis that this could snowball. Many townships are cash-strapped; this may potentially cause some communities to cancel recreational soccer leagues due to this extra cost. I am concerned that this could be yet another case of the majority being penalized for the good of the minority.

Please don't take this as an attack on the boy. I feel that an interpreter is something his parents should provide. Parents need to provide shinguards and specific socks and shoes for children to participate; an interpreter should be included in this category.

My child has braces. I provide a mouthguard for her to play. I have not hired an attorney to make her public school pay for one for her. I believe this is my responsibility as her parent.

Jerri Greenawalt-Buchanan

DuBois

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Find hilarity in the headlines
  2. Behind tax inversions
  3. ‘PC’ Ebola approach deadly
  4. Science on fracking’s side
  5. Vandergrift killing Olmsted’s vision
  6. Won’t stop drilling
  7. Sheetz-CVS hearing
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.