Like many longtime listeners of WJAS-AM, I was dumbfounded when, on the morning of Aug. 8, I turned my kitchen radio dial to 1320, expecting to hear Jack Bogut's voice, and there was a voice, but not his. I listened further, thinking it was just a commercial or that my radio had picked up another AM signal by mistake, but no such luck.
I went to my computer and Googled WJAS and that was when I saw the news story “WJAS completes news-talk format switch” saying the radio station had been sold and the new owners had changed the format.
So many people I have talked to — and no, we aren't all over 70 years of age — ask where you can go on the radio for that kind of music. Unlike the youth of today, many of us don't have iPods or smartphones and computers to download our favorite music or subscribe to Sirius satellite radio.
There are many radio stations in the Pittsburgh listening area, but if you don't like country, rock, classical, rap, '80s hits, talk or sports programs, you're out of luck. WJAS played what was called “easy listening” music from the '40s through today. It was the music that you could sing along with because you knew all the words to the songs you grew up with. Pittsburgh lost a real treasure.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Blame judges
- Hiring in Westmoreland I
- Hiring in Westmoreland II
- Atheists & religious expression
- Article painted wrong picture
- ‘Trust’ in God
- Fitz draws ire
- Honor Constitution
- Show appreciation
- Mitochondrial disease awareness