TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Rushing to judge

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, Aug. 28, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
 

Can anyone tell me how you get “justice” in the Michael Brown shooting by rioting, looting, burning down local businesses (including the store the kid robbed earlier), and the dark threat of vigilantism among those who want the home address of the shooting officer? (As if they'd stop by to just chat awhile.)

We know the victim likely committed a strong-arm robbery minutes before he died; that the “witnesses” who described the shooting, one of whom was his friend in the robbery, lied (based on the autopsy findings); and that even Missouri's governor couldn't hold a healing assembly to discuss the issue without people shouting him down. This is “justice”? This is “honoring” the victim?

How about we “honor” the judicial system and wait for the facts, for both sides of the story, and (no doubt) for the white officer's conviction (to spare the suburb of Ferguson even more rioting after the verdict). That officer doubtless used excessive force, but until I walk a mile in his shoes and face the issue of drawing my gun, I won't condemn until the jury decides.

That, in my opinion, is “justice,” not pandering to agitators and letting them loot and riot because they're angry.

Mark Fassio

Pendleton, Ky.

The writer is a former Leechburg resident.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. My takes on the news
  2. Obey speed limit
  3. A familiar VA experience
  4. Bigotry vs. opinion I
  5. Bigotry vs. opinion II
  6. Pension fairness
  7. MRIs & back pain
  8. An asset refused
  9. More ‘Mr. Downies’ needed
  10. Pension-letter ire I
  11. Pension-letter ire II