Better school security
The news story “Security tightens for Westmoreland, Fayette schools as year begins” discussed how some local schools are stiffening their security by adding cameras, increasing surveillance and adding school police officers to their staffs. In reality, these costly measures will do little to prevent or stop a violent intruder who has little or no regard for human life.
At least 20 percent of past school shootings have taken place outside the building, where none of these measures will help. Also, only about 10 percent of school shooters have entered the building by forcible entry because most of them were students who already had routine entry into any school building.
The only way to stop the threat as quickly as possible is by training the actual targets, the students and teachers, to work together to take down the threat as quickly as possible. Passive actions will only add to the body count.
Action needs to be quick and effective to immediately stop the threat. Many shooters have already been taken out by ordinary, untrained teachers and students.
The ALICE (Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Counter and Evacuate) program is one of the most effective and easily learned procedures to end threats and save lives.
The writer, a former teacher, is an ALICE training instructor.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Miss Penney’s catalog
- ‘Badges’ before Brooks
- Failing to lead
- Boys, girls & toys
- Corbett, the reformer
- GOP: Integrity
- Find hilarity in the headlines
- Behind tax inversions
- Tarentum demolition
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- Echoing Pelosi