Share This Page

Obama won't lead

| Saturday, Oct. 5, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Craig Eyermann is a research fellow with The Independent Institute, an Oakland, Calif.-based think tank. Eyermann spoke to the Trib regarding the climate in Washington, D.C., that led to Tuesday's federal government shutdown.

Q: Do you believe the atmosphere in Washington is more toxic today than it was the last time the federal government shut down in 1995?

A: I would argue that, yes, that is the case. A lot of that is just the nature of how partisan politics have developed over the last 20-odd years. Since that time, we've had more of a partisan division within Congress. For instance, there is no such thing as Blue Dog Democrats anymore — you know, Democrats who were relatively conservative on fiscal issues. Most of them are extinct, and the Democratic Party has shifted far to the left as a result.

Q: Have we reached a point where posturing has become more popular than actual governing?

A: I would say so, and I would actually attribute that mostly as a failure of executive leadership. The legislative (branch), by design, is going to be divided up between the political parties. On the executive side, the (president) has the role of taking charge in terms of setting priorities (and saying), “We are going to bring people together to negotiate this and we are not going to leave until we do whatever it takes to come up with a compromise or an agreement.” That's the thing that's really missing from all of this.

Q: Do these types of dramas pose any real threat to the nation's political fabric, or are they more manufactured crises that ultimately don't do much more than provide fodder for the 24-hour news cycle?

A: I think there is an element of grandstanding going on here. I think, look at the stakes for President Obama on this. He is in a situation where he requires the support of the base of the Democratic Party. I think to a large extent that is driving the lack of a desire to compromise at all on his part or even negotiate with congressional leaders.

Q: Do you expect the shutdown to have much of an impact on the economy?

A: No. I actually did the math for 800,000 federal government employees being furloughed. I figure it will take about 134 days before you could shave a tenth of a point off of the country's gross domestic product.

Q: Do you believe government by crisis is here to stay?

A: It depends who is in the White House. That's going to be very much (dependent) on the executive style of whoever is president.

Q: We're witnessing a government that attempts to function largely via threat and ultimatum these days. Would it be reasonable for the American people to conclude the wheels have fallen off of the government?

A: Yes and no. It boils down to, if you want to fix the problem, you change who is in the government.

Q: Sweeping change doesn't appear likely, so it's kind of like the line in the old Pogo comic strip — “We have met the enemy and he is us.” You're saying that if we're truly unhappy about what we're getting in Washington that it's incumbent upon us to do something about it?

A: No one else has the ability to do it.

Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media (412-320-7857 or eheyl@tribweb.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.