TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Obama's campaign-style rhetoric

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Saturday, Feb. 1, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
 

Martin Medhurst, a professor of rhetoric and communication at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, has authored or edited more than a dozen books on presidential rhetoric. He spoke to the Trib regarding President Obama's State of the Union address on Tuesday.

Q: What was your overall impression of the president's rhetorical style during the State of the Union address?

A: To my way of thinking, he took almost a campaign approach to the speech. Much of it, you know, was set for applause lines and things that you know he knew would be popular. So in that sense, I think it was a well-crafted speech, rhetorically.

It certainly followed the formula of most State of the Unions and touched on a little bit of everything. It was a fine performance, and the style of speech was very consistent with past Obama speeches. He used a lot of the same words that he used during his campaigns. From a purely rhetorical point of view, I think it was about as successful as a State of the Union can be.

Q: The president began the speech by mentioning a number of Americans working hard and overcoming struggles. Was that a powerful way to open, or did the fact that he failed to identify any of these people dramatically diminish their significance in the speech?

A: In a sense it was brilliant, because when he did use the unnamed Americans, in every instance they were illustrations of the success of his policies. It was a very — I won't use the word “sneaky” — but it was a rhetorically sophisticated way of praising himself while seeming to praise ordinary Americans.

Q: What stood out most to you about the speech?

A: At several key moments, I felt like I was listening to Obama the campaigner rather than Obama the president. That happened when he turned to women, which was clearly an appeal for the female vote. It happened (when Obama discussed) immigration. It happened at several points where I'm thinking: “This is not really about legislation. This is really about the 2014 elections.”

Q: So you believe the president was focused more on bolstering the chances of Democrat candidates by touting the successes of his administration than delivering a comprehensive address on policy and legislative initiatives?

A: This was at least as much a political address as it was a legislative address, and he sort of laid out some of the themes that midterm candidates could run on.

Q: Did any of the president's rhetorical tactics make an impression on you?

A: One of the interesting things rhetorically was how he married two terms that historically have been identified with different parties. Those terms were “progress,” which has historically been identified with the Democratic Party, and “opportunity,” which has historically been identified with the Republican Party.

He married those two terms I thought in a very interesting way and, in essence, sort of took the opportunity theme away from the Republicans. He said, “You know, here is opportunity, follow my way.” I don't know how successful that will be legislatively, but rhetorically I thought it was pretty interestingly done.

Q: What letter grade would you give the address?

A: It was a pretty good speech — probably a strong B, B-plus.

Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media (412-320-7857 or eheyl@tribweb.com).

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Pirates rout Cardinals to keep things interesting in NL Central
  2. Steelers remain confident in defense
  3. Security guard shot outside East Hills restaurant
  4. Pitt’s Narduzzi revisits YSU roots in opener
  5. Berry wins Steelers’ punting job; Wing traded to Giants
  6. Rossi: Baseball needs a new schedule
  7. LaBar: Best next opponent for Brock Lesnar
  8. State lawmaker proposes increasing cost of state fishing licenses
  9. Armstrong River Hawks make their debut
  10. Pirates notebook: Burnett continues to progress, amps up to 95-pitch simulated game
  11. Penn State offense confident it can have better season