ShareThis Page

Melding disciplines at CMU

| Saturday, April 11, 2015, 9:00 p.m.
hoover.org

Kiron Skinner is a Carnegie Mellon University associate professor of social and decision sciences, an author and a foreign policy scholar. She spoke to the Trib regarding CMU's new Institute for Politics and Strategy, which will open in July under her direction.

Q: What was the basis for forming the institute?

A: Throughout CMU's history, there has been a first-rate political science program. In recent years we've kind of merged the study of political science with international relations, and it became apparent there was a growing interest in bringing together those two disciplines. That really is the basis for it.

Related to that point is the fact that Carnegie Mellon is a global university. For a university that has campuses in Adelaide, Australia, Rwanda and a major Portugal initiative and other places as well, it's important to have some program on campus where there is a systematic study of globalization and the international system itself. This is part of the university's effort to make that happen.

Q: As the institute's initial director, what are your primary challenges in getting it off the ground?

A: There is such a ground-floor interest in the university — whether it's in computer science, the study of history, modern languages or engineering — to make the world a better place. I think Carnegie Mellon is well-suited to do that because it has so many researchers who focus on solving problems, not just generating theories.

So given that we have a problem-solving approach at the university, what I am seeing is that faculty and students are (asking) what they can do about the avoidance of war or cyber-security challenges. How can the new institute contribute to helping us identify and address these problems and help the United States be better at national (security) readiness, and also help our allies around the world in (improving in) cyber security, war avoidance and conflict resolution?

So I see my initial challenge as trying to bring the energy and ideas together in a way that I can support faculty, students and other researchers in realizing their intellectual potential.

Q: Do you anticipate any collaboration with other academic institutions or research organizations?

A: I do. The RAND Corp. in Pittsburgh has become of increasing value to the international relations and politics program at Carnegie Mellon through the first-rate researchers who have been teaching for us for a couple of years now. I see further integrating RAND researchers who are interested in partnering with the institute in research and teaching.

I also see (collaboration opportunities) with the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center (based) at CMU. It has excellent connections back to the national security community in Washington, especially the Department of Defense, and the intelligence community as well. I look forward to finding ways to work with SEI colleagues on projects that meet both the research and teaching needs on campus, but also help support them in the contracting work that they do for the defense and intelligence communities.

Q: Where do you see the institute being in five years?

A: I have some specific goals. I would like to see it be, both at the undergraduate and master's level, among the top 20 international relations programs in the United States.

Eric Heyl is a Trib Total Media staff writer (412-320-7857 or eheyl@tribweb.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.