ShareThis Page

Wealth's comforts: The wealthy's discomforts

| Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
Models pose beside the Rolls-Royce Canton Glory at the company's booth during the Guangzhou 2013 Auto Show in China's southern city of Guangzhou. (AP Photo | Kin Cheung)
Models pose beside the Rolls-Royce Canton Glory at the company's booth during the Guangzhou 2013 Auto Show in China's southern city of Guangzhou. (AP Photo | Kin Cheung)

Delving into the apparent social anxiety of being rich and the personal angst connected to U.S. income and wealth inequality, “Rich People's Secrets” was the Sept. 10 cover story of The New York Times' Sunday Review section.

“Over lunch in a downtown restaurant, Beatrice, a New Yorker in her late 30s, told me about two decisions she and her husband were considering,” wrote Rachel Sherman, a New School associate professor of sociology and author of “Uneasy Street: The Anxieties of Affluence.”

“They were thinking about where to buy a second home and whether their young children should go to a private school,” Sherman explained. “Then she made a confession: She took the price tags off her clothes so that her nanny would not see them. ‘I take the label off our six-dollar bread,' she said.”

A $6 loaf of bread, it seems, isn't enough to get overly repentant about, compared to a Rolls-Royce Phantom's $497,525 base price (plus add-ons to cover myriad factory customization options) or the $38.5 million price of the 12,900-square-foot penthouse at One Wall Street or, for on-wrist prestige, the $485,350 Rolex GMT Master II with white gold and diamonds (the same watch “preowned with papers” is $410,000).

For relaxation, consider the Southampton summer place on the market for $150 million (562 million Saudi riyals), featuring a 20,000-square-foot main residence, 16 bedrooms, 21 full baths and nine partial baths. It has 14 oceanfront acres, a bayfront lot, private beach walkways and, if the surf isn't picture-perfect, indoor and outdoor pools, two greens, a tennis court and pool, golf and tennis houses.

Still, these are all minor-league expenses compared to outlays in the world of super-yachts. The world's most expensive yacht, the 100-foot History Supreme, was purchased for $4.5 billion by an anonymous Malaysian businessman. The price was largely due to the 220,000 pounds of gold and platinum used, with a thin layer of solid gold enhancing the entire boat, from its full base to its anchors, staircases, dining area, decks and rails. The master suite features a bedroom wall made from meteorite rock, a statue made from Tyrannosaurus Rex bones, and a 24-karat-gold panoramic wall aquarium. Also onboard is an iPhone wrapped in 500 diamonds and a liquor bottle featuring a rare diamond valued at $45 million.

Worth $3 billion less than the History Supreme, the Eclipse is the world's second most expensive yacht, owned by Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich. Measuring 536 feet, it features a 70-member crew, 24 guest cabins, two swimming pools, a disco hall, two helicopter pads, three launch boats, a submarine, bulletproof windows, armor plating, an anti-paparazzi laser shield, intruder detection systems and a first-rate missile defense system.

President Herbert Hoover's Treasury secretary, Ogden L. Mills, once said, “On $50,000 a year, you can't even keep clean.” An American businessman, politician, lawyer and horse breeder, Mills owned Wheatley Stable, which owned and bred Seabiscuit as well as Bold Runner, whose offspring included Secretariat.

Ralph R. Reiland is associate professor of economics emeritus at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur (rrreiland@aol.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.