TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Good intentions & bad results

KAP
KAP cartoon for Reiland 12-31-12

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, Dec. 30, 2012, 8:39 p.m.
 

“If there is any lesson in the history of ideas, it is that good intentions tell you nothing about the actual consequences,” stated Thomas Sowell, economist at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

Similarly, Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman warned of the mixture of good intentions and big government. “Concentrated power,” he cautioned, “is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it.”

French writer Albert Camus (1913-1960) was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature in 1957. “The evil that is in the world,” he asserted, “almost always comes from ignorance, and good intentions may do as much harm as malevolence if they lack understanding.”

Aldous Huxley (1894-1963), British essayist and novelist, stated it more boldly: “Hell isn't merely paved with good intentions; it's walled and roofed with them. Yes, and furnished too.”

In “Brave New World,” a prophetic novel published in 1932 — prior to Stalin's purges and before Hitler came to power in Germany — Huxley described a tyrannical future where totally controlled and dehumanized slaves would “love their servitude.”

In the forthcoming society envisioned by Huxley, a technologically proficient and well-intentioned government replaced self-reliance and individual freedom with security, dependence, safety and drug-induced happiness — plus an abundance of carnal pleasures, commanded by the state's “everyone belongs to everyone else” decree.

What's required for the establishment of this “Brave New World” is putting the state up front in all matters and assigning individuals to the back burner. What's essential for implementation is for man to be precast, molded and enslaved to the program.

Launched in 1964 by President Lyndon B. Johnson, the “unconditional war on poverty in America” might arguably be the most expensive and longest-running example of Sowell's warning that “good intentions tell you nothing about the actual consequences.”

$15 trillion ‘war'

From 1964 until now, the federal, local and state governments have spent $15 trillion in the war on poverty — $12 trillion by the federal government and $3 trillion by state and local governments.

In “The American Welfare State: How We Spend Nearly $1 Trillion a Year Fighting Poverty — and Fail,” Michael Tanner, director of health and welfare studies at the Cato Institute, reports that the 2012 poverty rate “has risen to 15.1 percent of Americans, the highest level in nearly a decade.”

In 2012, “the federal government will spend more than $668 billion on at least 126 different programs to fight poverty,” in addition to “welfare spending by state and local governments, which adds $284 billion to that figure,” writes Tanner.

On a per capita basis, this roughly $1 trillion a year in welfare spending “amounts to $20,610 for every poor person in America, or $61,830 per poor family of three,” explains Tanner.

In contrast, the Census Bureau reports that the median household income in the United States dropped to $50,054 in 2011, the latest figure available, down 8 percent from 2007, the year before the recession began.

“Welfare spending increased significantly under President George W. Bush and has exploded under President Barack Obama,” states Tanner. “In fact, since President Obama took office, federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year. Despite this government largess, more than 46 million Americans continue to live in poverty.”

Bottom line, “The poverty rate is perilously close to where we began more than 40 years ago,” after $15 trillion in spending, Tanner reports. “Clearly, we are doing something wrong.”

Ralph R. Reiland is an associate professor of economics at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur. His email: rrreiland@aol.com

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. New Kensington residents vent anger at council meeting
  2. Playoff losses motivate West Mifflin boys soccer
  3. 71-year-old among 2 charged in several Pittsburgh area burglaries
  4. Veteran Geibel soccer team finally has depth to compete
  5. Four issues that the Steelers need to take care of in September
  6. Bell Township museum delighted to receive WWI uniform of prominent native son
  7. Pittsburgh Mayor Peduto says new police chief’s skills fit the job well
  8. New Allegheny Valley Joint Sewage Authority manager welcomes challenge
  9. Wainwright, Cardinals rough up Locke in 6-4 victory over Pirates
  10. Rossi: Longing for when `Browns Week’ mattered
  11. Roundup: Area drivers pay less for gasoline; Study to look at financial impact of gas boom; more
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.